Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 2.81, Δ 1.47).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Torino | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.81Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Torino | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 230 | Accurate passes | 486Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 555Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Torino | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Torino | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Torino | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |