Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.05 vs 1.49, Δ 1.56).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (61% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 3.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 389 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.03 | Goals prevented | 1.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.