Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 1.33, Δ 0.05).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.33Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 211 | Accurate passes | 303Lead |
| 258 | Total passes | 372Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.97 | Goals prevented | 0.97 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.