Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (32 vs 5 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 25%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 20Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 32Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 231 | Accurate passes | 408Lead |
| 317 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 13Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.