Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.92 vs 0.55, Δ 1.37).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (19 vs 4 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 456Lead | Accurate passes | 308 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |