Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 348Lead |
| 412 | Total passes | 441Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |