Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.39, Δ 0.11).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (19 vs 15 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.39 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 335 | Accurate passes | 346Lead |
| 401 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| -0.07 | Goals prevented | -0.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |