Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 0.66, Δ 0.14).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 326Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.31 | Goals prevented | -0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |