Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.53, Δ 0.69).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 366 | Accurate passes | 399Lead |
| 459 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |