Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.30, Δ 0.56).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 381 | Accurate passes | 535Lead |
| 463 | Total passes | 620Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.97 | Goals prevented | 0.97 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.