Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.77, Δ 0.96).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.77Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 505Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 581Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.25 | Goals prevented | 0.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.