Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.81 vs 0.80, Δ 1.01).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 418 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 483 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.23 | Goals prevented | -0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |