Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.58, Δ 0.08).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 347 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |