Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.06, Δ 0.46).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (15% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 477Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 558Lead | Total passes | 428 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.17 | Goals prevented | -0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |