Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes Match Statistics & xG

Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes Match Statistics & xG | Sportra

Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes in Major League Soccer.

Match statistics snapshot

Away created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 1.09, Δ 0.26).
Home fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
Away was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).

Toronto FCvsSan Jose Earthquakes

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
0.83	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	1.09Lead

1Lead	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	2
8Lead	Shots inside the box	6

3	Shots off target	5Lead
2	Shots on target	4Lead

3	Shots outside the box	4Lead
11Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	10

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
48%	Ball possession	52%Lead
79%	Pass accuracy	82%Lead
321	Accurate passes	350Lead
404	Total passes	426Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
8	Corner kicks	9Lead

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
6Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	1
3Lead	Goalkeeper saves	0
-0.86	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.	-0.86

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
17	Fouls	7Lead
	Red cards
2	Yellow cards	2

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Away leads this block

1Home

duels won

2Away

Away leads shot accuracy (+120% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home18%31% share
Away40%69% share
Away leads shot accuracy (+120% vs Home)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.07541% share
Away0.10959% share
Away leads shot quality (+44% vs Home)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home73%55% share
Away60%45% share
Home leads box penetration (+21% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads possession efficiency (+21% vs Home)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.01745% share
Away0.02155% share
Away leads possession efficiency (+21% vs Home)
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home3746% share
Away4354% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+23% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home3255% share
Away2645% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+23% vs Away)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

Away leads this block

0Home

duels won

1Away

Away — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.10959% share
Away0.07541% share
Away — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.3650% share
Away—50% share

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

3Home

duels won

3Away

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home21.066% share
Away11.034% share
Home leads (21.0 vs 11.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home37.947% share
Away42.653% share
Away leads (42.6 vs 37.9).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home16.052% share
Away15.048% share
Home leads (16.0 vs 15.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.07541% share
Away0.10959% share
Away leads (0.109 vs 0.075).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home89.149% share
Away92.551% share
Away leads (92.5 vs 89.1).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home25.071% share
Away10.029% share
Home leads (25.0 vs 10.0).

Toronto FCvsSan Jose Earthquakes

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
0.83	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.	1.09Lead

1Lead	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	2
8Lead	Shots inside the box	6

3	Shots off target	5Lead
2	Shots on target	4Lead

3	Shots outside the box	4Lead
11Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	10

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
48%	Ball possession	52%Lead
79%	Pass accuracy	82%Lead
321	Accurate passes	350Lead
404	Total passes	426Lead

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
8	Corner kicks	9Lead

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
6Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	1
3Lead	Goalkeeper saves	0
-0.86	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.	-0.86

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
17	Fouls	7Lead
	Red cards
2	Yellow cards	2

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

Away leads this block

1Home

duels won

2Away

Away leads shot accuracy (+120% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home18%31% share
Away40%69% share
Away leads shot accuracy (+120% vs Home)
2
xG per shot
Average danger per attempt. Higher means better chances, not just more shots.
Home0.07541% share
Away0.10959% share
Away leads shot quality (+44% vs Home)
3
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home73%55% share
Away60%45% share
Home leads box penetration (+21% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads possession efficiency (+21% vs Home)

1
xG per possession %
Chance creation per share of the ball — separates sterile possession from threat.
Home0.01745% share
Away0.02155% share
Away leads possession efficiency (+21% vs Home)
2
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home3746% share
Away4354% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+23% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home3255% share
Away2645% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+23% vs Away)

Defensive

How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.

Away leads this block

0Home

duels won

1Away

Away — stronger shot quality allowed

1
xGA per shot conceded
Quality of chances allowed per opponent shot — lower means a compact, limiting defence.
Home0.10959% share
Away0.07541% share
Away — stronger shot quality allowed
2
Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)
xG faced divided by saves made — higher means the keeper faced tougher stops.
Home0.3650% share
Away—50% share

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

3Home

duels won

3Away

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home21.066% share
Away11.034% share
Home leads (21.0 vs 11.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home37.947% share
Away42.653% share
Away leads (42.6 vs 37.9).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home16.052% share
Away15.048% share
Home leads (16.0 vs 15.0).
4
Clinical index (xG/shot)
xG per shot — finishing threat independent of volume.
Home0.07541% share
Away0.10959% share
Away leads (0.109 vs 0.075).
5
Defensive compactness
Inverse of xGA per shot faced — higher means opponents got worse chances.
Home89.149% share
Away92.551% share
Away leads (92.5 vs 89.1).
6
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home25.071% share
Away10.029% share
Home leads (25.0 vs 10.0).

Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes Match Statistics & xG

Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Toronto FC vs San Jose Earthquakes match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor

Shot accuracy

xG per shot

Inside box ratio

xG per possession %

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

xGA per shot conceded

Save difficulty (xG faced ÷ saves)

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Clinical index (xG/shot)

Defensive compactness

Chaos factor