Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 1.09, Δ 0.26).
- Toronto FC fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 321 | Accurate passes | 350Lead |
| 404 | Total passes | 426Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.86 | Goals prevented | -0.86 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toronto Fc | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |