Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 0.42, Δ 0.38).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 337 | Accurate passes | 532Lead |
| 410 | Total passes | 596Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.