Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (0.10 vs 3.68, Δ 3.58).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (15 vs 3 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 0.10 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.68Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 343Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 425Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |