Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 0.32, Δ 1.59).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 78%Lead | Ball possession | 22% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 732Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 818Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |