Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 3.39, Δ 2.71).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (23 vs 8 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.39Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 280 | Accurate passes | 333Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 404Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |