Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 0.48, Δ 1.66).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (22 vs 4 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 166 |
| 520Lead | Total passes | 241 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |