Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 1.34, Δ 0.09).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (88% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 365Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 459Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 1.22 | Goals prevented | 1.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |