Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 0.48, Δ 1.07).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 544Lead | Total passes | 403 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |