Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 1.75, Δ 0.13).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.75Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 664Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 748Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |