Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (2.25 vs 0.72, Δ 1.53).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 366Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tottenham | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |