Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 1.81, Δ 1.16).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Toulouse was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 258 | Accurate passes | 492Lead |
| 347 | Total passes | 583Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.