Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 1.62, Δ 0.96).
- Lens fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.62Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 199 | Accurate passes | 509Lead |
| 268 | Total passes | 571Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.62 | Goals prevented | 0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Toulouse | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.