Match statistics snapshot
- Trabzonspor created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.91, Δ 0.26).
- Fenerbahçe was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 43%).
- Trabzonspor held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Trabzonspor | Statistic | Fenerbahçe |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Trabzonspor | Statistic | Fenerbahçe |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 375Lead | Accurate passes | 258 |
| 442Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Trabzonspor | Statistic | Fenerbahçe |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Trabzonspor | Statistic | Fenerbahçe |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Trabzonspor | Statistic | Fenerbahçe |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |