Match statistics snapshot
- Tranmere created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 0.48, Δ 0.15).
- Bristol Rovers was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 65%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 203Lead |
| 325Lead | Total passes | 312 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Bristol Rovers |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.