Match statistics snapshot
- Tranmere created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 1.50, Δ 0.08).
- Cheltenham fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Cheltenham held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 254 | Accurate passes | 297Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 401Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.