Match statistics snapshot
- Oldham created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 1.32, Δ 0.83).
- Tranmere fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Oldham was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 256Lead | Accurate passes | 189 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |