Match statistics snapshot
- Tranmere created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.28, Δ 0.91).
- Shrewsbury fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Tranmere was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 223 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tranmere | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.