Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (0.03 vs 5.62, Δ 5.59).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (37 vs 1 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (49% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 5.62Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 29Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 18Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 37Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 155 | Accurate passes | 491Lead |
| 262 | Total passes | 592Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |