Match statistics snapshot
- Rosengård W created the clearer chances on xG (0.14 vs 4.52, Δ 4.38).
- Rosengård W fired more attempts (30 vs 3 shots).
- Trelleborg W was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.52Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 20Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 14Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 30Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 455Lead |
| 317 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.