Match statistics snapshot
- Växjö created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 4.15, Δ 3.52).
- Växjö fired more attempts (31 vs 8 shots).
- Trelleborg W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.15Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 31Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 503Lead |
| 321 | Total passes | 605Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Trelleborg W | Statistic | Växjö |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |