Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 1.00, Δ 0.34).
- Tromso fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 641Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 717Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.