Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 1.09, Δ 1.07).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
- Tromso held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 459Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 545Lead | Total passes | 436 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |