Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (1.65 vs 0.44, Δ 1.21).
- Tromso fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Tromso held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 479Lead | Accurate passes | 341 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 416 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.