Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (2.82 vs 1.79, Δ 1.03).
- Ham-Kam fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Tromso held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.79 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 478Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 566Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |