Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 0.74, Δ 0.25).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 366 | Accurate passes | 545Lead |
| 438 | Total passes | 626Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |