Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 0.70, Δ 1.19).
- Tromso fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Tromso was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 494 | Accurate passes | 506Lead |
| 558 | Total passes | 582Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Odd Ballklubb |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |