Match statistics snapshot
- Rosenborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.96, Δ 0.83).
- Tromso fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.96Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 443Lead | Accurate passes | 425 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 492 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |