Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (1.86 vs 1.24, Δ 0.62).
- Tromso fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Valerenga was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tromso | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tromso | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 459Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 403 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tromso | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tromso | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tromso | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |