Match statistics snapshot
- Verl created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 1.59, Δ 0.92).
- Verl fired more attempts (7 vs 6 shots).
- Verl was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tsv 1860 München | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 7Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tsv 1860 München | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 590Lead |
| 322 | Total passes | 662Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tsv 1860 München | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tsv 1860 München | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tsv 1860 München | Statistic | Verl |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |