Match statistics snapshot
- TSV Hartberg fired more attempts (14 vs 3 shots).
- WSG Wattens was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 36%).
- TSV Hartberg held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 342 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.