Match statistics snapshot
- TSV Hartberg fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- WSG Wattens was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
- TSV Hartberg held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 347Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Tsv Hartberg | Statistic | Wsg Wattens |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.