Tukums 0-2 Riga Prediction

TukumsTukums
0 — 2FT
RigaRiga

Updated

Match DNA · Predictions ↗

Open / transitional — model leans Riga

Estimated win chances: Tukums 24.8%, draw 21.3%, Riga 53.9%. From 31 and 31 competition matches.

TempoHigh
VolatilityLow
Expected goalsHigh
Tactical styleOpen / transitional
Upset potentialMedium
Draw riskLow
Model confidenceHigh

Outcome model

Sportra's estimate from each team's season goal rates. It is a statistical guide, not betting advice.

Goal expectancy

1.34Expected goals2.05

From 31 and 31 competition matches

Likely scorelines (Poisson)

  • 1–210.2%
  • 1–19.9%
  • 0–27.6%
  • 0–17.4%
  • 1–37%

Form & momentum

Weighted momentum, recent result run, and form-window W–D–L — the live pulse before kickoff.

25Cold spellTukums
Weighted momentum

Riga arrives with stronger form weighting (+52 momentum).

77Hot streakRiga
Tukums · High-risk / fragileRiga · hot form

Tukums

5W · 9D · 17L
Recent →DLWLLLWLLLLLLWDLLLDDWWLDDLDDLDL
Momentum index

Riga

22W · 7D · 2L
Recent →WWDDLDWWWWWDWWWWWWDWWWDWWWDWWWL
Momentum index

Form split comparison

Wins, draws, and losses across the sampled form window

Season record

League totals anchoring the snapshot — points, goal balance, and season shape vs opponent.

Table gapRiga +49

Tukums

24 pts
16% wins

5W · 9D · 17L · 31 played

For
44
Against
61
Goal diff -17

Riga

73 pts
71% wins

22W · 7D · 2L · 31 played

For
86
Against
30
Goal diff +56

Season shape comparison

League table W–D–L, goal balance, and form-run counts from league profile signals

League depth signals

Extremes, discipline windows, and split stats from the full league profile.

Matchup edges

Attack vs opponent defense in the matchup comparison.

  • Tukums offensive edge

    Tukums faces a stingier defense than their attack rating suggests.

    -27
  • Riga offensive edge

    Riga's attack (64%) vs Tukums's defense (38%).

    +26

Team comparison

Comparison indices from the match data partner.

Attack rating

Attacking threat in the final third.

Tukums36
Riga64

Defense rating

How well each side limits chances.

Tukums38
Riga63

Momentum

Weighted form score (recent results count more).

Tukums25
Riga77

Matchup edge

Attack vs opponent defense (positive = favourable matchup).

Tukums-4
Riga102

Volatility

Higher = more swingy results (big losses, goals against).

Tukums41
Riga30

Form index

Head-to-head form comparison from the model.

Tukums33
Riga67

H2H pull

Historical dominance in recent meetings.

Tukums15
Riga85
TukumsHigh-risk / fragile
Rigahot form

H2H in this snapshot

From 10 meetings included in this prediction snapshot.

4Tukums40%
2Draws
4Riga40%

Recent meetings