Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 1.86, Δ 0.58).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Twente was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Twente | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Twente | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 293Lead |
| 389Lead | Total passes | 381 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Twente | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Twente | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Twente | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |