Match statistics snapshot
- U.
- Catolica fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 489Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.