Match statistics snapshot
- U.
- Catolica fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead |
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 298Lead | Accurate passes | 159 |
| 390Lead | Total passes | 247 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |