Match statistics snapshot
- Coquimbo Unido created the clearer chances on xG (0.16 vs 2.28, Δ 2.12).
- Coquimbo Unido fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
U. Catolica vs Coquimbo Unido
U. Catolica vs Coquimbo Unido
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 0.16 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.28Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 333 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| U. Catolica | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |